Posterous theme by Cory Watilo

A Story about my life living in a Nursing Home from early 1997 to late 1998.

It is now 2011, but the below story was written in 2003 a brief explanation of what it was like living
in a nursing home after my car accident when I became a quadriplegic, got
out of the hospital and had nowhere to live. I wrote this story the 1st time I ever
gave a testimony to the State of Ohio legislators. Actually, this was one of the early times
of my advocating for people with disabilities since I had been injured. I got
involved as a member of the Ohio Olmstead Task Force, a grassroots coalition
of people with disabilities of all ages, family members, advocates and
organizations advocating together for the right to live, work and participate
in their communities. . If you don't know what I'm referring to as "Olmstead" it
means:


The Olmstead decision of 1999 confirmed that states must ensure that people with
disabilities do not experience discrimination by being institutionalized when they
could be served in a more integrated social community setting. This important
decision has laid the foundation for people with disabilities to sue for discrimination
and impingement of their civil rights in states where people have been put at risk
due to a lack of community-based services.


This link is a good informal video talking about the Olmstead decision 10 years
later, with testimony from those who 1st started the lawsuit:



After leaving the nursing home in 1998, finishing my college education in 2001, I have
been employed full-time for the Federal Government for the last 12 years, live
independently in my own home, and lead a very active lifestyle. I no longer am living on
state and federal subsidized tax dollars, but earning an income salary, like all citizens of
the United States desire, regardless of race, color, nationality, sex, or disability. I have
lived with a spinal cord injury for 15 years. I often think about the year and a half I
spent living in a nursing home when I was 22 years old. There is no reason for any
individual with a disability to be institutionalized, no matter what the disability.
Even for those who have various types of disabilities that may require assistance
and utilize public subsidized state monies, it is far less money spent out of a State’s
budget to have people with disabilities living independently in the community, then
in an institutional setting. Discrimination comes in many forms. For years, people with
disabilities have fought for their civil rights to pass laws against discrimination, through
awareness; we learn to become an inclusive society.


My name Betsy Volk, I am a person with a DisAbility. Notice, “Ability” within the
word first.
---------------------------------


2/2/03- A brief story about my life institutionalized in a nursing home:
There are many different reasons people with disabilities live in facilities such as nursing
homes. Unfortunately, most do not understand the rights we have as people with
disabilities, and are left institutionalized most of their life. My story of life in an
institutional nursing home begins in 1997 until September of 1998, when I moved to
southern Ohio to finish college. Previously, I had been in an automobile accident six
months earlier during which time was spent in several hospitals recovering, and now
faced with a disability.


At the end of my initial hospital stay, I had now been disabled for 3 months, a
quadriplegic, and paralyzed from the chest down, "Where are you going to go" were the
first words uttered from the social director and occupational therapists mouth. This was a
very good question. The only other option besides finding a long-term care facility in
which I could receive more rehabilitation was a nursing home. Luckily, I moved to a
long-term care rehab center in which provided excellent spinal cord injury rehabilitation.
Of course, one cannot stay for too long on Medicaid dollars still receiving rehabilitation
of physical therapy and occupational therapy. So, the search for a nursing home facility
again, was my only option. I had no idea what was available to me as a person with a
disability. The facility where I was currently located no longer was accepting
“quadriplegics”, as they “stated” quadriplegics require too much care and their nursing
dollars were cut short. This was surely an example of a facility in financial instability, as
there were several other quadriplegics living at this nursing home. Now, in 2003, I laugh
a bit at this “too much care” thing, as I require approximately 4 hours in a 24-hour period,
of assisted personal care with my needs. A prime example of why it is cheaper to live
outside of an institutional setting and less state budget tax dollars spent on people with
disabilities, especially when I was 21 years old.


Knowing I wanted to go back to school somehow to get my college degree, I located a
nursing home facility; which was about 15 minutes from the school I desired to attend.
After arriving at my new home, I was wheeled to my room that I would spend the next
year and half. I was 21 years old and before my disability I knew most everything. (Or
so I thought). Suddenly, after sitting in my new room for 15 minutes alone, I knew that
the world was going to be a very challenging place. I felt as if I ever wanted to make
anything of myself again; now was the time to try to figure some mid-term solution.


Almost a month after I moved in the nursing home, I started attending classes at a
community college. Going to classes was my only escape into a world where people did
not look at me as if I lived in a nursing home, look down upon me, or thought I was
incapable of doing things. At times, I would take my power wheelchair into the town
where the nursing home was located. With my power wheelchair that I bought with
donated money to me, I would wheel to the bank, in the center of the small town and I
opened up a checking account. This way at least I could take control somewhat of
finances and deposit my social security check I received of $38 dollars a month to live
on. The rest of my Social Security check went to the nursing home every month.
Eventually, I would wheel around the small town to become familiar. I even went to a
football game in the hometown once, and even to the local tavern bar a few times. The
nursing home had such a fit issue about me going to the bar to have fun. God forbid I
could make any decisions on my own, or do something I wanted to do. But each time, I
had to go back home to a facility full of people three times my age; who may not
remember me from one day to the next. I’m not saying I disliked the resident’s; actually
I cared quite deeply for them and their safety. There were some rather unusual “things”
that occurred with theirs; and my care.


I was able to have a phone line in my room I paid for monthly in which I had a computer
and access to the Internet. The Internet became a pathway to freedom for me. I gained
valuable knowledge of services that may be available to obtain. Some people are not able
to have this resource because of lack of funding. I was able because a local Lions Club
organization donated money in which I could spend on a new computer, and I met a good
friend who would help me learn about the computer more and set it up for me. I was very
grateful. Oh yes, and the cable TV I had was good entertainment especially since the
cable TV was an “amenity”.


Healthcare quality of care went up and down in the nursing home. Only a couple of the
personal care assistants lasted a longtime because they were hard workers and there was
not much work in the town that I lived in. Usually, a new face would always be seen
working as an aide in the home. Many would call off, and they would never get fired. At
first I was told when I was going to get up, and when I was going to go to bed. This was
totally unbelievable, as the nursing home was staffed 24/7, or supposed to be.

Days went by, months went by, yet no one offered to give me any choices to leave the nursing home.  One time, I was so ill, that I did not feel I could make my doctor's appointment. The
nurses would not listen to me, and they insisted on wheeling me down the hallway. I
ended up having a seizure from Autonomic Dysreflexia; related to my spinal cord injury.
The seizure caused me to bite off part of my tongue in which I ended up needing six
stitches. Other similar episodes occurred, however I will not continue.


Another time, scabies were present in some of the residents at the nursing home. I was
the only resident allowed to leave the facility or get dressed for several weeks because I
was attending classes. Everything in my room, all my clothing, and decorations had to be
bagged up. By this time, I felt as though I was certainly living in very sad conditions I
never imagined myself to be. Many times I would consult other residents who would not
speak out because they were scared. I felt as though I became a spokesperson for older
residents. Here I was, a 22-year-old by this time playing Pokino, Bingo, and any other
nursing home activities.


Meanwhile, in late summer 1998, with the support of the Bureau of Vocational
Rehabilitation, a State Funded agency, I was able to find a private home health care
agency in Dayton, OH that would help take care of me until my paperwork could be
transferred to Greene County where I would finish my education at Wright State
University. I was constantly on the phone in my room. I knew this was it, or I never
would leave. Many told me I would never leave. I felt as though living in a nursing home
could be a transition, however it wasn't this way. Many times I often wondered if there
was any other options. I knew there had to be, but how do you find them?


After moving out of the nursing home, there was a certain freedom that I felt I had not
had ever since my accident and becoming a person with a disability in 1996. The first
time I went to a store such as Meijjer, I sat in disbelief. I could not believe how fast
paced our world is. It was as if I had been locked away from life and suddenly I felt it
again. Today, I remember those days in 1997 in which I spent with other residents who
had been living in that nursing home for years. It almost brings me to tears. I remember
when each person died whom I lived with day after day, and the woman who died a slow
death of cancer in the room adjacent to mine. When one day she was smiling, and the
next day her smile turned into bones and her yearning for life to end.


I asked myself, is this how it's really meant to be for someone who does not choose their
disability and is 22 years old? Why do I have to be put through these things? Is this how
our government really chooses to have our disabled live their lives? How quickly one
day can change from the next. We do not know what will happen in the future of our
lives. But one thing we should be guaranteed is the independence to choose our own way
of life and living, and not have to be in institutions that degrade and tear us down
mentally every day.


Since moving out of the nursing home, I graduated from college with a Bachelor's degree
from Wright State University. I am currently employed with the US. Department of
Energy’s Miamisburg Closure Project in Miamisburg, Ohio working a 40-hour week. I
no longer receive benefits because according to Social Security I am no longer disabled
due to making wages. I live alone with my service dog Trooper. I receive care in which
I hire all my attendants privately in the morning and in the evening. Otherwise, I spend
days hoping that others like myself will not be subject to living in institutional life like I
did for a year and half.


At times, I still have psychological thoughts that my life could turn in which I would need to return
to a nursing home facility. Being guaranteed the right to not have to live in the nursing
home is only one stepping-stone for people with disabilities. Making sure there are
adequate services for people with disabilities in the community is an important task.
Please consider how your life would be if you are faced with the conditions of living in a
nursing home. You would want to choose the way to live your life just as you do now,
correct?


Thank you for taking the time to read my story. I hope it has enlightened your view of
what life is like for young people with disabilities who live or have lived in nursing
homes.  Promote Community Choice living for people with Disabilities!

Dc_photo_of_bv

iPad App: Voice and Audio Digital Recording App PureAudio Live Recorder

Am going to try thisAPP to use with Dragon Dictate voice to text transcript.  You can sync wifi.  Andrea Electronics has released a full function digital voice and audio recording application for the iPad as well as for the iPhone and iPod touch, PureAudio Live. More about this new iPad app:  (blog source  below)

PureAudio Live Recorder is a full function digital voice and audio recording application for use with Apple iPad devices. The PureAudio Live Recorder is enhanced with Andrea’s patented digital noise reduction microphone technology. PureAudio digitally reduces background noise, while enhancing the recorded sound quality and intelligibility when making recordings in real-world noisy mobile environments.

PureAudio features include:
Application:
-Fast application start-up, for capturing quick impulse recordings.
-Intuitive simple to use interface.
-User guide for easy instruction to all features and functions.
-Recordings can be transcribed on your PC by using speech to text applications like Dragon NaturallySpeaking Preferred Edition.

Audio:
-Digital noise reduction software to remove repetitive background noise from recordings.
-Microphone sensitivity boost allows for far field recordings.
-Automatic boost reduction helps eliminate microphone clipping and recording distortion.
-Speaker volume boost to amplify weak recordings..
-Microphone input level VU meters.
-Four different sampling rates to control the size and quality of the recordings.
-Three different recording formats: WAVE, CAF, AIFF

Recording & Playback Functions:
-Access rapid playback with a single click.
-Single button to play all recordings.
-Ability to fast forward, pause & reverse during playback.
-Fast forward and fast reverse during playback using finger swipe gestures, or by using the audio position slider.
-Append to existing recordings.
-Ability to pause during a recording.
-Easy navigation between recordings, using finger swipe gestures.

Recording Storage:
-Unlimited recording time with device-memory read out.
-Organize, store and retrieve recordings using editable category folders.
-Automatic numbering helps keep recordings organized in sequence.
-Rename recordings.
-Easy to move recordings to different categories.
-View detailed information about recordings.
-View recordings by category, or view recordings in all categories at once.
-Add, delete, rename and rearrange recording categories.
-Delete all recordings.

Transfer Recordings:
-Directly email your audio files in real time - not just as a link.
-Wi-Fi sync quickly transfers audio files right to your computer.

PureAudio Live recording app is available now for $2.99 in the Apple iTunes Store: http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/pureaudio-live-recorder-for/id364721953?mt=8

Blog source:  http://www.mobiletechreview.com/ubbthreads/showflat.php?Number=36714

(download)
Andrea webpage: http://www.andreaelectronics.com/ipodrecorder.html

April 5, Anniversary of Section 504

 Protests and civil disobedience forced the signing of Section 504’s implementing regulations 34 years ago today, April 5, 2011

On September 25th of 1973 President Nixon signed Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. but for nearly four years, the government failed to enforce Section 504.

 And so, on April 5, 1977, thousands of "the disabled" converged on Department of Health, Education and Welfare offices around the country to demand that the equal rights legislation Congress had passed 5 years earlier be implemented.  In San Francisco they took over the HEW Office and started what became the longest sit-in occupation of a federal building in U.S. history

It's a little-known moment in a little-known civil rights movement. But for people with disabilities, it's a moment as important as Selma or Stonewall. A band of disabled people at a sit-in at a federal office building in San Francisco, refusing to leave, and refusing to be discounted .

People with disabilities were enforcing the first major law to bar discrimination against the disabled population. The protesters believed the law would bring one of the nation's most isolated and powerless groups into the mainstream.

What they wanted was the signing of regulations to finally enact the law known as Section 504, a part of the 1973 Rehabilitation Act.  Section 504 would force hospitals, universities -- any place that got federal money -- to remove obstacles to services and provide access to public transportation and public places.

The signing of the 504 regulations signified the public birth of the Disability Rights Movement.  It ushered in an era of disability activism, empowerment, and legislative victories based on the legal concepts of nondiscrimination and integration that is embodied in section 504. 

Section 504 laid the ground work for the American's With Disabilities Act of 1990 which established broad civil rights protections for individuals with disabilities. 

Section 504 implementation was a turning point in the disability rights movement. It helped the disabled to be seen as an oppressed group which had (and still has) a legitimate struggle for civil rights. There are many things today that the disabled population take for granted. Bathrooms are accessible. Curb cuts.  Access in so many different ways is either directly or indirectly a result of the regulations.  And most important, to be counted a equal part of society, just like anyone else of any creed, origin, race, or nationality.

 

DOL ODEP and Partnership for Public Service join forces

ODEP News Release: [03/31/2011]
Contact Name: Bennett Gamble or Gloria Della
Phone Number: (202) 693-4667 or x8666
Release Number: 11-0447-NAT

US Labor Department’s Office of Disability Employment Policy and Partnership for Public Service join forces to increase federal hiring of people with disabilities

WASHINGTON — Kathleen Martinez, assistant secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor's Office of Disability Employment Policy, andMax Stier, president and chief executive officer of the Partnership for Public Service, today signed an alliance agreement to advance President Obama's executive order to increase federal hiring of people with disabilities.

By offering federal agencies and related employer/employee organizations technical assistance and research-based model programs, ODEP and the PPS jointly will promote effective disability employment strategies, policies and practices government-wide.

"By working together, ODEP and the PPS will be able to identify what federal agencies need to fulfill the requirements of the executive order, as well as offer valuable support and resources toward accomplishing those goals," said Martinez.

The Partnership for Public Service is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that works to revitalize the federal government by inspiring a new generation to serve and to transform the way government works.

ODEP's mission is to provide national leadership by developing and influencing disability employment-related policies and practices affecting an increase in the employment of people with disabilities. In addition to the Partnership for Public Service, the agency has alliances with several organizations — the Society of Human Resource Management, the U.S. Business Leadership Network and the National Association of Governors' Committees on People with Disabilities — aimed at enhancing the employment of people with disabilities in the private sector.

Source: http://www.dol.gov/opa/media/press/odep/ODEP20110447.htm

Dreams and Passion

At first dreams seem impossible, then improbable, then inevitable.” – Christopher Reeve

Image

Remembering you are going to die is the best way I know to avoid the trap of thinking you have something to lose. You are already naked. There is no reason not to follow your heart.” ~ Steve Jobs

“Pay your debts, you deadbeat.”- DEBT COLLECTOR BARRED FROM USING FACEBOOK

DEBT COLLECTOR BARRED
FROM USING FACEBOOK
A Florida judge has ordered a debt collection agency to not use Facebook or any other
social media site in an attempt to locate a woman over a $362 unpaid car loan.
Judge W. Douglas Baird also ordered Mark One Financial LLC of Jacksonville, Fla. to
refrain from contacting the woman’s family or friends on Facebook.


The order is part of a lawsuit that Melanie Beacham filed last August against the debt
collection agency. According to court documents, Beacham said Mark One sent messages to her
and her family on the Facebook networking site to have her call the agency about the debt.
Billy Howard, the woman’s attorney with the Morgan and Morgan law firm in Tampa,
said the debt collectors violated Beacham’s privacy. He said they also violated a provision of
Florida’s consumer protection law that prohibits debt collectors from harassing people.
Howard said that in the past four months, nearly a dozen potential clients have contacted
him because debt collectors have used social media sites to track them down. “It’s the beginning
of an epidemic,” Howard said, calling it “another weapon” debt collectors can use.

Beacham claims Mark One contacted her six to 10 times a day by phone, sent her a text
message, contacted her neighbor and sent a courier to deliver a letter to her workplace, according
to court documents.


Mark One did not respond to press inquiries, The Associated Press reported. Last
November, the agency said it would not discuss Beacham’s case and denied any wrongdoing.
The company acknowledged that its collectors use Facebook to find people when they don’t
respond to other means, like letters and phone calls, The AP reported.
Social media experts and lawyers like Howard say that debt collectors are increasingly
trying new tactics to contact people who owe money. In one Chicago case, a man was friended
on Facebook by a young woman in a bikini. The account turned out to be a debt collector’s,
something the man realized only when the “friend” posted a message on his wall: “Pay your
debts, you deadbeat.”

*Posted As Seen in Privacy Times*

NLRB SETTLES WITH COMPANY OVER ‘FACEBOOK FIRING’

NLRB SETTLES WITH COMPANY
OVER ‘FACEBOOK FIRING’
A Connecticut ambulance company has settled a lawsuit brought by the U.S. National
Labor Relations Board (NLRB ) involving the firing of an employee who had published negative
remarks about her boss on her Facebook page.


A lawsuit filed by the NLRB against American Medical Response of Connecticut Inc.
(AMR) on October 27, 2010, argued that the company illegally terminated Dawnmarie Souza for
criticizing her supervisor on her personal Facebook page. The NLRB said Souza’s negative
comments were protected speech under federal labor laws.


The lawsuit also alleged that AMR illegally denied union representation to the employee
during an investigatory interview, and maintained and enforced an “overly broad” blogging and
Internet posting policy that “contained unlawful provisions.”


Souza wrote on her Facebook page, “Love how the company allows a 17 to be a
supervisor,” referring to AMR's code for a psychiatric patient, and called her boss a “scumbag
as usual,” using her home computer, after she was denied the right to seek union help before she
responded to a supervisor’s questions about a customer complaint.


AMR said it had fired her following complaints about her work. Souza served as an
emergency medical technician for the company.


The case has received widespread attention for its groundbreaking attempt to set legal
limits on employers’ Internet policies. The financial terms of the settlement were not disclosed
but workplace policy reforms were detailed.


Under the settlement, AMR has agreed to change its blogging and Internet policy that
barred workers from making disparaging remarks against the company or their supervisors.
The company also will revise another policy that prohibited employees from depicting the
company in any way over the Internet without permission.


Both policies prevented AMR workers from discussing wages, hours and working
conditions with others, the NLRB said.
“Under the settlement approved by Hartford Regional Director Jonathan Kreisberg,
Souza didn’t get her job back, but AMR agreed to revise its 'overly broad rules' to ensure that
they do not improperly restrict employees from discussing their wages, hours and working
conditions with co-workers and others while not at work, and that they would not discipline or
discharge employees for engaging in such discussions,” the NLRB said in a statement.
PRIVACY TIMES/March 2, 2011 Page 7


The company will no longer deny employee requests for union representation when
meeting with managers. Moreover, employees, who request union representation, would no
longer be threatened with discipline, according to the agency, the agency said. Souza said she
has no intentions of rejoining the company.

*Source: As seen in Privacy Times*